Council asked for a traffic report. We'll tell you which one.
Most DAs that stall on traffic and parking don't stall on anything dramatic. They stall on a bay width, a ramp transition, a sight triangle, or a report prepared by someone council doesn't accept as qualified. Sightline provides the technical evidence that closes those questions before they become a Request for Information.
What developers and architects come to us for
Knowing which report you actually need — a Traffic Impact Statement for a smaller development, a full Traffic Impact Assessment where network impact is significant. Getting this wrong costs weeks
Parking that complies, or a case for why it doesn't need to — AS 2890 compliance assessment and supporting documentation, and carpark demand assessments that justify a reduction on evidence rather than assumption
Driveways on difficult sites — gradient, transitions and ground clearance resolved on steep or constrained blocks, including Performance Solutions where full compliance genuinely isn't achievable
Sight lines and access — the AS 2890.1 sight triangle checked in CAD against your actual layout, and heavy vehicle access confirmed by swept path before construction locks it in
Send us the architectural set, the site address and a description of the development, and we'll tell you what council will ask for.
Where developers usually start
Route to the pages you needSend us the drawings. We'll tell you what you need.
2. Site address
3. Description of the development
Contact